Food Shortage - What Food Shortage?

The UN claims that Food production must double byludicrous". An 18-month study, which found that "too
2050 to meet the demand of the worlds growingmany supermarket practices are still unhealthy, unjust
population. However, most of the worlds productiveand unsustainable", said Wrap should adopt a "more
farmland is already in use, so increased foodaspirational approach to reducing waste in food retail
production will require extending intensive farmingby setting longer-term targets and [supporting] a
methods with greater use of pesticides and fertilizersculture of zero waste".
leading to the increased release of greenhouse gases.All this suggests that voluntary regulations are either
Paradoxically, UK government policy is attempting toineffective or far too slow to take effect. The
deal with both of these problems simultaneously withbottom line is that waste is endemic to
plans to "boost food production in Britain and reducecontemporary economic ideology because corporate
its impact on the environment". Is this realistic, or isobligations require them to increase growth and
there an easier way?profits and an effective means of achieving this is by
Calculations based on waste and calorie intakeencouraging excessive public consumption. Until these
suggest that the UK has access to at least doubleobjectives are replaced with ones that are more
the food necessary for adequate nutrition. Sincebeneficial to society than businesses, any significant
farming, retail and eating habits are probably similarprogress in meeting sustainable targets without
throughout the developed world, this implies there isimposing strong regulations will be very limited.
no real food crisis in terms of the amount produced,Based on this information it is possible to draw up a
only in how it is consumed. Therefore, a betterlist of obligations that could be imposed on the food
strategy must be to focus on reducing food wasteindustry to significantly reduce food waste.
rather than growing more. This would minimise the1 Retailers should be obliged to stock a proportion of
impact on the environment, reduce food expenditure,food, that would be presently rejected due to
and achieve better food security with a healthierappearance, but otherwise meets safety standards.
lifestyle for the population.This could be marketed as cheap 'sustainable'
Using our present methods, significant food wasteproduce in addition to, or possibly in preference to
occurs at all stages of the food industry. The firstexpensive organic foods which are of dubious health
waste stream occurs at the production stage due toand environmental benefits.
damage and accidental harvesting through weather,2 Hotels, Restaurants and other communal places of
pestilence and machinery, resulting in unsuitable qualityeating could purchase this sustainable produce to
and appearance. In storage, losses can be attributedmeet their environmental targets. The food could can
to pests and micro-organisms causing reductions inbe re-cut for aesthetic value or simply merged with
the nutritional values and edibility of food. Furtherother foods in pies & stews etc.
losses are generated during processing and packaging3 Retailers should be obliged to sell all stocked food
due to the handling of food and by shrinkage inby a 'use by' date or pay a tax that should be set
weight or volume. Whilst foods which contradicthigh enough to discourage waste. One method of
safety standards need to be removed from theachieving this would be to introduce a variable pricing
food chain, such regulations can conflict with effortsmechanism based on the demand throughout the sale
to reuse food waste such as in animal feed. Theperiod which is gradually reduced to near zero by the
amount of food wasted before arriving at the retaileruse by date.
is unknown but may amount to at least 20% of that4 Damaged packets should be re-labelled as low
farmed.carbon pet food or animal feed if this doesn't
Of the food which arrives at the retailer 5% isendanger safety, or if this is not possible,
wasted due to exceeding 'use by' dates and packagebiodegraded using composting and anaerobic digestion
damage. Dr Martin Caraher, an expert in food policyto produce methane for fuel and enrich agricultural
at City University in London, says: "Use-By dates aresoil.
in retailers financial interests. If customers throw food5 To avoid consumer waste, all foods should be
away, they have to replace it by buying even more.purchasable in smaller amounts at a constant unit
Use-By dates can be a happy accident for them".price and separated into compact sealable units to
The largest waste stream is by the consumersensure they are kept fresh as long as possible. This
themselves who throw away 30% of all preventablewould avoid excess buying which often leads to
wasted purchased food. Whilst a proportion of this iswaste.
discarded by being left uneaten on the plate or6 Retail policies that lead to excess buying should be
unserved, much food is rejected for being unfresh ordiscouraged. These include moving items around the
beyond the 'use by' date of the package label. Whilststore and placing essentials at the rear of store to
this could be blamed on poor domestic management,encourage coverage and residence time. Retail
consumers are heavily influenced by marketingpromotion and prominent positioning that encourages
practices, and have limited control over purchasepurchasing should also be reserved for sustainable
quantities and the packaging of food, which are theproducts.
responsibility of the food industry.7 When new products are introduced small samples
Finally, including children it is estimated that we eat onshould always be offered, so as to avoid buying large
average about 2320 Kcal/day/person in the UK. This,quantities of unwanted food.
could be an underestimate, yet is still 10% more8 Unnecessary purchases and impulse buying could be
calories than is necessary for an average personsminimised by avoiding trips to the retailer altogether
recommended intake based on the UK agethrough Internet ordering and cost competitive and
distribution and gender and reference nutrient intakeenvironmental delivery schemes such as the COAST
tables. In addition to placing extra strain on the foodsystem suggested in this report. This purchasing
supply chain, this can lead to a variety of healthsystem would help consumers manage shopping
problems for individuals who eat far more than theirmore efficiently via web based shopping lists, by
required intake.anticipating when a new item is needed from the
In total, according to these calculations only aboutdate and their purchasing history. This system would
45% of the food actually farmed is actuallyreduce waste and excess eating by minimising any
necessary for adequate nutrition, and most of theexcess food lying around the home.
remaining 55% of waste is preventable, amounting to9 Restaurants and fast food outlets should always
the equivalent of 72 million tonnes of greenhouseoffer the option of smaller portions with a
gases per year in the UK. This is approximately 10%proportionate reduction in price. Private servings are
of the total UK output and almost as much as itsobviously more difficult to reduce; however,
entire transport system!promoting a general culture of rejecting waste and
There have been previous initiatives to reduce foodextravagance should be nurtured amongst the public.
waste. The official UK government line is that "most10 Health advice needs to consider promoting more
of the major supermarket retailers in the UK....havedurable foods in preference to perishable fruit and
committed to work with the Government'svegetables if these offer a more practical, equally
waste-reduction programme (WRAP) to identifynutritious and 'low carbon' alternative.
ways they can help us, their customers, to reduce11 Temperature sensitive strips could be placed on
the amount of food thrown away".selected packages that warn the consumer if the
However, are we taking a too lenient line with thefridge thermostat has been set too low.
food industry? The Sustainable Development12 Set tough annual targets for reduced waste
Commission thinks so. It condemned targets set bythroughout the food industry
WRAP as "unambitious and lacking urgency". withThese measures should increase the worlds food
multi-buy promotions helping to fuel waste andsupply by reducing food waste rather than increasing
obesity in Britain. Mr Lang, who is also professor ofproduction with a corresponding benefit for the
food policy at City University, London said that threeenvironment.
years ago, the government-funded WRAP left it upLet's not be reticent about confronting businesses
to supermarkets to find voluntary "solutions to foodand politicians with these ideas if they claim to be
waste" in an agreement dubbed the Courtauldgenuinely concerned about minimising waste, and
Commitment. "The Government is frankly not usingensure we are not fobbed of with offers of
its leverage adequately. It really should toughen up onvoluntary measures and green wash!
Courtauld, which must be enforced because this is