Lean Thinking: what is it?

There is a problem in industry: we have gone into thetremendous reduction in lead-times and dramatically
21st century with enterprises, organisations andenhanced responsiveness to clients' needs and
business structures conceived and designed in theexpectations - astonishing reductions in product
18th and 19th centuries to perform well in the 20th...development times - elimination of the division of
The principles that gave origin to industry werelabour principle, replaced by the multi-skill
conceived back in 1776, when the British economistmulti-function principle - much higher involvement of
Adam Smith published his famous book entitled "Anpersonnel at all levels and incredibly higher levels of
Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth ofjob satisfaction - drastically reduced supervision - and
Nations". Considering that in those times there wasmany others.
practically no industry, some very excellent principles,There is a name for this new, revolutionary approach:
conceived by a real genius, were laid out. SmithLean Manufacturing, or manufacturing with no waste
visualised that the future wealth of the world would(where waste is the "fat" in the system). Lean
be founded and based on industry. Smith went also aManufacturing has proved over the years to be
step further, engineering practical principles for theworking very well: Smith/Taylor era has been
future would-be industry, including his famous principleshut-down once and forever, at least in the
of "Division of Labour" (the whole job to bemanufacturing operations sector.
sub-divided into a number of elementary tasks, eachBut not all manufacturers have embraced the Lean
assigned to a dedicated, single-skill worker).approach: many still ignore it - many of them only
Those principles, that originated the "first industrialpartially - many of them have rushed through a TPS
revolution", were actually deployed and appliedcourse, introduced some form of "pull" or "kanban"
industrially only more than 100 years later, when theproduction, replaced some pieces of machinery, and
automotive industry was born. Introduced by Henryproclaimed themselves "lean". Pure deception. Their
Ford at the beginning of the last century with theamount of waste is still enormous. The Lean road
first industrial assembly chain, and then perfected inrequires much more than a course and a few
the 30's by Sloan, general manager of Generalchanges or some improvement here and there!
Motors, Smith's principles proved to be operationallyAnd the other industrial sectors? They have been
valid and effective: productivity was well acceptable,much, much slower than manufacturers...
if not excellent.Take the project/construction sector, for instance.
Sloan, actually, went one step further: since theThis industry is in some ways not completely shifted
principle of labour division was working so well in thefrom craft to mass production - much less to lean
shop floor, why not applying the same concept toproduction. On the other hand, the industry has
Management? Functions (administrative, financial,followed the mass production model in its extensive
commercial, production, maintenance…..) and Rolesdivision of labour and hierarchy-based management,
were thus invented, resulting in a number of differentSmith & Taylor style. The consequences? 1) Cost
managers each taking charge of a different functionalOverruns 2) Delays on Schedules 3) Waste.
area of the organisation.9 out of 10 projects show cost overruns (of up to
Frederick W. Taylor, one of the first industrial50%, and even more). Overrun is found in over 30
consultant in history, perfected even further Smith'snations on 5 continents. Overrun is constant for the
and Sloan's principles, developing his so-calledpast 70 years. Delays on completion are typical,
"Scientific System" already in 1911. Like Smith andconstant, chronic features of most project works.
Sloan, Taylor focused acutely on "efficiency", theirWaste is in many cases of astronomical proportions.
common driving force. Taylor's newly introducedWasted labour can amount up to 70% (yes, seventy
principles were:percent) of the total labour content (just spend 10
1) levels of management (so that each managerminutes observing carefully any construction site at
would take care of a controllable number ofany random time in any random day and watch
subordinatespeople "working": you will discover that most people
2) clear definition of roles, responsibilities andon site are carrying out non-value-adding activities
authorities (so that everyone would know what tosuch as handling, moving, transporting, idling, talking,
do, what to be accountable for, and what would fallpreparing, searching, walking... or making or repairing
under his area of competence and authority)mistakes... - as opposed to adding value to the object
3) strong accent on "planning" and "control" (so thatof the project). The 3 consequences above are
subordinates' jobs, at each hierarchical level, would bestrictly interlinked and have a common denominator:
planned properly - and then monitored by theiran inadequate organisational system and an
respective supervisors).inadequate style of thinking.
In a nutshell, according to Taylor, for an organisationAnd the service industry? And the public sector?
to function efficiently it should be "structured"Exactly the same. The level of wasted manpower is
hierarchically and "organised" like a Swiss clock: everyun-measurable.
detail should be taken care of - every little gearThe level of dis-service or poor service found in
should turn properly, accurately and efficiently. Termsairlines, airports, banks, insurance companies, hospitals,
such as "Role Description" and "Job Description" werehotels and any other service provider (such as power
invented at that time.generating/distributing companies, telephone
Taylor took into due consideration also anothercompanies and the like) is often astronomical and,
principle initially introduced by the US Railways alreadyunfortunately, on the increase - world-wide. With few
from 1860 (the time of the far West...). Sinceexceptions.
railways were single-track, accidents (trains collisions)In parallel, the level of value, attention and care given
had to be prevented. The solution was simple: rules -to clients is getting poorer and poorer. Banks still
there had to be rules. So that engine drivers wouldmake mistakes and let you cue indefinitely. Insurance
know what to do and what-to-do-not, respectingclaims get settled (when they do get settled) after a
rules (signals, timetables….). Obviously, in along, painful struggle.
rules-governed environment, there must be someoneHospitals still feature room shortages and long waiting
who thinks of and makes the rules, and someonetimes for an intervention (not to mention
else to obey and comply with the same. That'smistakes…). Luggage still gets lost by airlines and
actually how "bureaucracy" was initiated.delays on scheduled departures are chronic. Instead
This "Functional-Tayloristic" industrial model had itsof a passenger, you become a seat number. You
glorious times in the 1950's - 1960's. Yesterday'sopen a bank account and become an account
industry was born.number. In a typical hotel, you become a room
But also today's industry was born.number. You report a fault to a telephone company
Yes, because still today most enterprises, businessor a power distribution company and you become a
organisations and governmental structures are builtreference number. If you have some complaint or
according to the first industrial revolution principles.want satisfaction, you are referred to a "call centre"
Maybe with some changes here and there - but not(mass production! heritage of the Smith & Taylor
many.mentality) where you are nobody and have no joy.
The alert reader will now ask: "so, what is wrongThe list could carry on forever.
with that"? Well, not much, except for the fact thatWhat is the problem? Organisations (or most of
these principles are rather "dated".them) seem not to be able to cope with the
Because the world changed. When? No-one knows.complexity associated with the changing environment.
Someone says 12 years ago, someone else saysThe more pressure is put on them and the more
15-18 years ago... But that is not so important (thecorrective measures they try to adopt, the worse
world, actually, has always been changing). What isthe failures! It's the final coma of the first industrial
important instead is the degree of acceleration of therevolution system, culture and mentality. The only
change: faster, and faster, and faster, What hasway out of this vicious circle is a revolution in the
changed? Everything. From any angle of view: social,opposite direction. That's where Lean Thinking comes
political, economical, financial, commercial,to the rescue.
technological, informatical…. The main differencesLean Thinking (LT) - that's the name given to this
between Smith's and Sloan's and Taylor's world andrather recent industrial philosophy and operational
today's world are stability and predictability. Smith anddiscipline - is the extrapolation of lean principles,
Taylor lived in a rather stable (almost static) and wellimplemented from long time in manufacturing
predictable world. We don't. What was true andoperations, for their deployment in all economical
certain yesterday is most probably no longer validsectors (project - construction - services - continuous
today or tomorrow… Moreover, this world of oursprocessing - public sector - etc.) as well as in all
becomes more and more complex by the day.enterprises' processes (administrative, product
Take clients, for instance. Also clients have changeddevelopment, accounting, etc.). In a nutshell: LT
dramatically and are still changing. They demand morefocuses over the removal of waste from the entire
and more. Today's clients are real "monsters", neverValue Chain.
satisfied, never happy. They want more and more,The main targets? Maximisation of value to the
faster and faster. Today's client want what they(monster) customer. Drastic elimination of waste in all
want, with the features they want, with the speed,processes (core and support) that generate value for
pace and timing they want, at the price they want,customers. Elimination or drastic re-dimensioning of all
and even with a smile on top (the cherry on thethose processes (and functions) that do not
cake). They are pretending, they are demanding,contribute to generate value to the customers.
they are absurd sometimes in their requests.Minimisation of all times required to provide value to
This facts alone puts a tremendous pressure on anythe customers. Zero defects, errors and
industrial, commercial, business and governmentalnon-conformities.
system. The impact is enormous.How are these achieved? By scrapping once and
That's where we start discovering the deficiencies offorever all the principles of the first industrial
the Smith/Taylor system, which does not seem torevolution.
be ready to cope with that pressure and impact. ThisIn practice: flattening of organisational structures -
became evident already in the late 60's - 70's.thorough re-engineering of the organisation "per
Pipe-smoking consultants and university professorsprocess" and not "per function" - insertion of multi-skill
started squeezing their brains in search of newmulti-function workers/operators/employees in
methodologies, management techniques andvalue-generating processes, which they self-control
sophisticated organisational philosophies, with the aimand for which they are accountable - continuous,
of helping industry and business organisations touninterrupted flow (of the necessary value-adding
remain competitive, to increase efficiency andactivities) triggered and "pulled" by the customers -
productivity, to excel or at least survive in a worldcontinuous aim at lean excellence, by eliminating the
becoming more and more turbulent. Hundreds ofresidual, inherent or surrounding waste. This is done
disciplines have been invented over the last 40-50by deploying operationally a number of "lean" tools:
years. To mention just a few: Management bytools for "seeing" the waste - tools for "measuring"
Objectives, Effective Leadership, Diversification, Zthe waste - tools for "mapping" the waste - tools for
Theory, Situational Leadership, Effective"scrapping" the waste - tools for enhancing value and
Communication, Zero-based-Budgeting,value added - tools for generating lean opportunities -
Decentralisation, Team Building, Management bytools for lean, creative thinking - tools for continuous
Exception, Dale Carnegie techniques, Interpersonalimprovement in the "lean" direction.
Skills, Quality Circles, Excellence, Restructuring,LT principles can be applied to any industrial,
Portfolio Management, Interactive Management,commercial and human activity. They can be applied
Matrix Organisational Structure, Kaizen and Continuousto commercial and trade operations, to office work,
Improvement, Total Quality Management, ISO 9000,to health practices. Under the larger LT umbrella now
6 Sigma, Theory of Constraints..... and One-Minutefall disciplines such as Lean Manufacturing
Managing......(manufacturing industry) - Lean Project &
All of them have somehow succeeded in bringing aConstruction Management (project-driven industry) -
bit of fresh breeze on slack enterprises' sails. But allLean Processing (service and public sector) - Lean
of them have also failed because most organisations,Kaizen (all sectors) - Lean Accounting (all sectors).
still today seem not to be able to find their way toObviously, disciplines are disciplines, and tools are
real performance and high, stable competitiveness, intools. They can be learnt, they can be obtained, they
spite of their hard efforts.can be purchased. Culture cannot. Modern, industrial
The real break-through came only in the 80's. Thelean culture can only be "fabricated" in-house, within
Manufacturing Industry started feeling the hard pinchthe organisation, by those concerned - starting from
of the environmental change almost 30 years ago.top management.
The famous TPS - the Toyota Production System -This is the hardest and trickiest part of the transition
created the revolution in manufacturing. Just-in-Time,to "lean": changing culture. Unfortunately, the Smith &
Flow Production, and other allied disciplines such asTaylor heritage is very heavy. It has taken
Total Productive Maintenance, Quick Change-Overgenerations to digest and implement the principles of
and Total Employee Involvement were thenthe first industrial revolution. It will take years or
conceived and systematically deployed at Toyota, indecades to digest those of the second one. Our
Japan, and gradually all over the world. Theirindustrial DNA is heavily polluted by traditional
common-base principles? Exactly the opposite ofprinciples. We are still in love with the mass and batch
those preached by Smith and Taylor. After all, theproduction mentality, with traditional planning,
Smith/Taylor system was good and right for theirsupervision and control. With order and efficiency.
times, when people had limited or no education, andWith roles, authorities and job descriptions. With rules
industrial culture didn't even exist. The Japanese wereand procedures. Even hairdressers, retailers, and
the first to realise the draw-backs of the system:housewives (yes, housewives!) have fallen in love
based on localised "efficiency" associated with masswith batch production principles. The resistance to
production and economies of scale, the system"lean" is and remains heavy.
overlooked or ignored completely the "fat" betweenWe'll need to "slaughter", to change skin, like snakes
points of efficiency, around and above them: all thedo. We'll need to transform managers into coaches.
non-value-adding activities (such as handling, moving,We'll need to "fabricate" a new breed of people,
transporting, storing, parking, stockpiling, controlling,people driven by value principles and not by "job"
inspecting…. and searching, idling...) between orprinciples. People dedicated to re-conceive, improve
around "points of efficiency" - all non-value-addingand perfect the processes they handle, which they
activities in the very "points of efficiency" (such ascan understand, and for which they are responsible.
making mistakes or producing defects, or machineryPeople who enjoy working and producing value, and
breaking down, or idling, or stopping... or lines ordraw satisfaction from it. New millennium craftsman in
machines being set-up for production...) - and the fattheir workshops. New millennium traders in their shop.
associated with the governing structure aboveIn strict contact with their customers. People to
(management waste: such as waste in supervision,whom pride and professional and work dignity,
waste in control, waste in inadequate orusurped by over a century of labour division and
un-necessary planning, waste in bureaucracy, waste intop-control practices, will finally be given back. People
paperwork, waste in meetings...).who can think: lean (that's why the name: Lean
Two core key-words were identified by theThinking). It will take time.
Japanese: value and waste, the one the enemy ofYet, lean practices start being deployed in many
the other. By systematically eliminating waste andareas other than manufacturing operations: project
perfecting/enhancing value-adding activities, theworks - health industry - retail sector - insurance
Japanese first and then the Western Manufacturerscompanies - to mention just a few. And there are
have reached tremendous goals: productivityexamples even in the public sector. The results are
improvements above 100% (compared to the massastonishing and very, very encouraging.
production/efficiency-based system of before) - zeroThere is space for lean. There is hope to make this
defects in the quality domain - zero break-downs inworld of ours function in a better, leaner, value-based
the plant/machinery area - almost zero set-up time -way.